10
сен
Ic Prog Windows 7
Posted:adminThis feature is not available right now. Please try again later. Ic Prog Windows 7 64 is a program collection with 11 downloads. The most lightweight of them are Microcontroller Programmer (sized at 34,613) and IC-Prog (sized at 597,601), while the largest one is Batronix Prog-Express with 34,321,674 bytes.
IC-Prog Prototype Programmer, programs: PIC16F818, 16F819, 16F630, 16F676, 12C508, 16C84, 16F84, PIC 16F877, 24C16, 24C32, 93C46, 90S1200, 59C11, 89C2051, 89S53, 250x0, PIC, AVR, 80C51 etc. IC-Prog Prototype Programmer Programs: 12Cxx, 16Cxxx, 16Fxx, 16F87x, 18Fxxx, 16F7x, 24Cxx, 93Cxx, 90Sxxx, 59Cxx, 89Cx051, 89S53, 250x0, PIC, AVR, 80C51 etc.
This software package allows you to program all types of serial programmable Integrated Circuits using Windows 95/98/NT/2000/ME/XP You are visitor number since the 15th of August 2000, says Mr Digit Counter Please visit my sponsors. 
Itry to avoid those USB to RS-232 converters. I've had a couple of problems with them, but not what you have described. I used to use IC-Prog years ago, and remember some issues with RS-232 use on XP, but not in detail.
I've found two problems with USB/RS-232 adapters though. Chessbase 10 portable best. Three that I used all overheated, and would fail to operate after being plugged in for more than 30 minutes or so, even if unused, and also did not return an error on failure.
Additionally, if there was a framing error on the signal into the RS-232 Rx, then the adapter would have an unrecoverable failure, and need to be unplugged and re-inserted. I bought two Sunix RS-232 PCI cards, which are working well for me (though they can also get a bit hot if left running for too long). If you are using a desktop PC, they are an option. There are cheap ones from Hong Kong on e-bay, which might be OK. Otherwise, a more expensive USB programmer (like ICD 2) might be worthwhile. ORIGINAL: o.fairhall Otherwise, a more expensive USB programmer (like ICD 2) might be worthwhile.
Nothing beats PICkit 2 in its price range. It supports almost all Flash PICs/dsPICs and support debugging of many PIC16F/18F device. The support is very good. If you want a somewhat more reliable programmer, Olin's USBprog seems to add some protection and Vdd driving capability and have no problem with lower USB voltage on some USB ports. But it supports not as many PICs as PICkit 2 and does not support debugging. With PICkit 2 in the marketplace, I do not see any needs for the serial port based simple JDM like programmers especailly if your motherboard does not have a serial port. ORIGINAL: o.fairhall I use the ICD 2 at work (it's just what they buy).
It's fine to use, but they're actually not very robust. I've only used the MPLAB SIM, not the in circuit debugging. Is the PICkit2 fairly comparable in it's debugging features to the ICD 2?
For real production run, perhaps you want to get Promate III. For lab use, I think PICkit 2 and ICD2 are both fine.
As for the debugging, PICkit 2 supports less MCU than ICD 2 right now. So you need to check if your chips are supported or not. The PICkit 2 hardware is as capable as ICD2 but the host software side is not yet matured as ICD2. For those chips it supports, it should act very similar to ICD2.
Popular Posts
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later. Ic Prog Windows 7 64 is a program collection with 11 downloads. The most lightweight of them are Microcontroller Programmer (sized at 34,613) and IC-Prog (sized at 597,601), while the largest one is Batronix Prog-Express with 34,321,674 bytes.
IC-Prog Prototype Programmer, programs: PIC16F818, 16F819, 16F630, 16F676, 12C508, 16C84, 16F84, PIC 16F877, 24C16, 24C32, 93C46, 90S1200, 59C11, 89C2051, 89S53, 250x0, PIC, AVR, 80C51 etc. IC-Prog Prototype Programmer Programs: 12Cxx, 16Cxxx, 16Fxx, 16F87x, 18Fxxx, 16F7x, 24Cxx, 93Cxx, 90Sxxx, 59Cxx, 89Cx051, 89S53, 250x0, PIC, AVR, 80C51 etc.
This software package allows you to program all types of serial programmable Integrated Circuits using Windows 95/98/NT/2000/ME/XP You are visitor number since the 15th of August 2000, says Mr Digit Counter Please visit my sponsors.
Itry to avoid those USB to RS-232 converters. I\'ve had a couple of problems with them, but not what you have described. I used to use IC-Prog years ago, and remember some issues with RS-232 use on XP, but not in detail.
I\'ve found two problems with USB/RS-232 adapters though. Chessbase 10 portable best. Three that I used all overheated, and would fail to operate after being plugged in for more than 30 minutes or so, even if unused, and also did not return an error on failure.
Additionally, if there was a framing error on the signal into the RS-232 Rx, then the adapter would have an unrecoverable failure, and need to be unplugged and re-inserted. I bought two Sunix RS-232 PCI cards, which are working well for me (though they can also get a bit hot if left running for too long). If you are using a desktop PC, they are an option. There are cheap ones from Hong Kong on e-bay, which might be OK. Otherwise, a more expensive USB programmer (like ICD 2) might be worthwhile. ORIGINAL: o.fairhall Otherwise, a more expensive USB programmer (like ICD 2) might be worthwhile.
Nothing beats PICkit 2 in its price range. It supports almost all Flash PICs/dsPICs and support debugging of many PIC16F/18F device. The support is very good. If you want a somewhat more reliable programmer, Olin\'s USBprog seems to add some protection and Vdd driving capability and have no problem with lower USB voltage on some USB ports. But it supports not as many PICs as PICkit 2 and does not support debugging. With PICkit 2 in the marketplace, I do not see any needs for the serial port based simple JDM like programmers especailly if your motherboard does not have a serial port. ORIGINAL: o.fairhall I use the ICD 2 at work (it\'s just what they buy).
It\'s fine to use, but they\'re actually not very robust. I\'ve only used the MPLAB SIM, not the in circuit debugging. Is the PICkit2 fairly comparable in it\'s debugging features to the ICD 2?
For real production run, perhaps you want to get Promate III. For lab use, I think PICkit 2 and ICD2 are both fine.
As for the debugging, PICkit 2 supports less MCU than ICD 2 right now. So you need to check if your chips are supported or not. The PICkit 2 hardware is as capable as ICD2 but the host software side is not yet matured as ICD2. For those chips it supports, it should act very similar to ICD2.
...'>Ic Prog Windows 7(10.09.2018)This feature is not available right now. Please try again later. Ic Prog Windows 7 64 is a program collection with 11 downloads. The most lightweight of them are Microcontroller Programmer (sized at 34,613) and IC-Prog (sized at 597,601), while the largest one is Batronix Prog-Express with 34,321,674 bytes.
IC-Prog Prototype Programmer, programs: PIC16F818, 16F819, 16F630, 16F676, 12C508, 16C84, 16F84, PIC 16F877, 24C16, 24C32, 93C46, 90S1200, 59C11, 89C2051, 89S53, 250x0, PIC, AVR, 80C51 etc. IC-Prog Prototype Programmer Programs: 12Cxx, 16Cxxx, 16Fxx, 16F87x, 18Fxxx, 16F7x, 24Cxx, 93Cxx, 90Sxxx, 59Cxx, 89Cx051, 89S53, 250x0, PIC, AVR, 80C51 etc.
This software package allows you to program all types of serial programmable Integrated Circuits using Windows 95/98/NT/2000/ME/XP You are visitor number since the 15th of August 2000, says Mr Digit Counter Please visit my sponsors.
Itry to avoid those USB to RS-232 converters. I\'ve had a couple of problems with them, but not what you have described. I used to use IC-Prog years ago, and remember some issues with RS-232 use on XP, but not in detail.
I\'ve found two problems with USB/RS-232 adapters though. Chessbase 10 portable best. Three that I used all overheated, and would fail to operate after being plugged in for more than 30 minutes or so, even if unused, and also did not return an error on failure.
Additionally, if there was a framing error on the signal into the RS-232 Rx, then the adapter would have an unrecoverable failure, and need to be unplugged and re-inserted. I bought two Sunix RS-232 PCI cards, which are working well for me (though they can also get a bit hot if left running for too long). If you are using a desktop PC, they are an option. There are cheap ones from Hong Kong on e-bay, which might be OK. Otherwise, a more expensive USB programmer (like ICD 2) might be worthwhile. ORIGINAL: o.fairhall Otherwise, a more expensive USB programmer (like ICD 2) might be worthwhile.
Nothing beats PICkit 2 in its price range. It supports almost all Flash PICs/dsPICs and support debugging of many PIC16F/18F device. The support is very good. If you want a somewhat more reliable programmer, Olin\'s USBprog seems to add some protection and Vdd driving capability and have no problem with lower USB voltage on some USB ports. But it supports not as many PICs as PICkit 2 and does not support debugging. With PICkit 2 in the marketplace, I do not see any needs for the serial port based simple JDM like programmers especailly if your motherboard does not have a serial port. ORIGINAL: o.fairhall I use the ICD 2 at work (it\'s just what they buy).
It\'s fine to use, but they\'re actually not very robust. I\'ve only used the MPLAB SIM, not the in circuit debugging. Is the PICkit2 fairly comparable in it\'s debugging features to the ICD 2?
For real production run, perhaps you want to get Promate III. For lab use, I think PICkit 2 and ICD2 are both fine.
As for the debugging, PICkit 2 supports less MCU than ICD 2 right now. So you need to check if your chips are supported or not. The PICkit 2 hardware is as capable as ICD2 but the host software side is not yet matured as ICD2. For those chips it supports, it should act very similar to ICD2.
...'>Ic Prog Windows 7(10.09.2018)